Strategic Foresight &amp; Faultlines

Hridbina ChatterjeeResearch Analyst

CHINANOVEMBER 3, 2026

How Chinese Activities Ecologically Impact Tibet and Downstream Regions

Author: Hridbina Chatterjee | Research Associate Executive Summary The Tibetan Plateau is the single most important source of fresh water in Asia. The Indus, Sutlej, Karnali, Gandaki, Koshi, Brahmaputra, Salween, Mekong, Yangtze and Yellow rivers all begin in its glaciers, snowfields, springs and high wetlands, and together they sustain well over a billion people across South, Southeast and East Asia. Since the People’s Republic of China took control of Tibet in 1950, this landscape has been treated less as a shared ecological commons and more as a frontier to be secured, engineered and extracted. Over the past two decades the pace of that transformation has accelerated sharply. Mainstream dams on the Yarlung Tsangpo, a mega hydropower project at the Great Bend in Medog, highways and railways driven through unstable valleys, fortified border settlements, expanding mining, the forced sedentarisation of nomads, and even large-scale attempts to modify the weather over the Plateau have all been pursued by Beijing with little transparency and almost no consultation with downstream countries. This report examines those activities against the background of the catastrophic flood of 26 August 2026, which tore through the Lhende Khola, Bhote Koshi and Trishuli corridors on the Nepal-Tibet border. By the end of September, Nepal Police were reporting 1,452 confirmed dead and 5,132 people listed as missing, while on the Chinese side Xinhua has held Tibet’s toll at 43 dead with 519 missing since 6 September. Hydropower plants, the Rasuwagadhi and Gyirong border crossings, dozens of bridges and long stretches of highway were wiped out, and Nepal’s Finance Minister estimated reconstruction costs at US$4 to 5 billion, close to a tenth of the national economy. The scientific consensus now places the trigger of the 2026 collapse on the Nepali flank of Langtang Lirung, and this report does not claim that any single Chinese project caused it. The disaster matters for a different reason. It came just thirteen months after the July 2025 flood that did originate in Tibet, from a supraglacial lake on the Purepu Glacier in Gyirong County, and it fits a long pattern of transboundary cryosphere disasters descending from the Plateau. More importantly, it exposed how little the downstream states know about what is happening upstream, how badly exposed critical infrastructure has been sited in the flood path, and how Beijing continues to treat hydrological and environmental information as a strategic asset rather than a humanitarian obligation. The central argument of this report is that Chinese policy on the Plateau is steadily raising the ecological risk carried by Tibetans and by the people of Nepal, India, Bangladesh and Bhutan, while denying them the information and voice they need to protect themselves. The report closes with a set of practical recommendations for downstream governments, regional bodies and the wider international community. 1.Introduction: The Water Tower Under Management The Plateau is often called the Third Pole because it holds the largest store of ice outside the polar regions. It is also warming faster than most of the planet. Assessments of the Hindu Kush Himalaya have found that glaciers in the region disappeared 65 percent faster in the 2010s than in the the preceding decade, and that on current emissions pathways as much as 80 percent of present glacier volume could be gone by the end of the century. Even if warming is held below 2°C, a loss of roughly a third to a half of the ice is projected. More recent observations show that ice loss rates across the region have roughly doubled since 2000. Climate change is a global problem, and China alone cannot be blamed for it. But how a state manages a warming mountain system is very much a national choice. A government that recognised the fragility of the Plateau would slow down, map its hazards openly, share its data freely, and involve both local Tibetan communities and downstream neighbours in decisions about large projects. Beijing has done almost the opposite. It has treated the Plateau as an engine for national energy supply, a buffer for territorial security and a laboratory for top-down environmental engineering. Tibetans have had little say in any of this, and countries downstream have had even less. The consequences of this approach are visible at three levels. On the Plateau itself, rivers, wetlands, grasslands and pastoral communities have been reshaped by dams, drainage, mining and resettlement. Along the Himalayan border, construction for trade and military access has pushed roads, ports and settlements into narrow valleys exposed to floods and slope failures. And downstream, in Nepal, India and Bangladesh, people living along glacier-fed rivers face growing hazards with less and less warning. 2.The August 2026 Flood: What Happened At about 8:37 in the morning on 26 August 2026, a very large slab of fractured rock and glacier ice broke away from the north face of Langtang Lirung, a peak of over 7,200 metres close to the border. The mass fell roughly 1,200 metres into the valley of the Lhende Khola, the stream that marks the boundary between Nepal’s Rasuwa district and Gyirong County in Tibet. It shattered into a mixture of pulverised rock, ice and meltwater, picked up loose sediment from a channel that had already been stripped and widened by the previous year’s flood, and became a debris flow of extraordinary speed. The energy released was strong enough to register on seismometers in the United States and Germany as the equivalent of a magnitude 5 earthquake, and early reports did in fact describe it as a quake. The surge smashed into the confluence at Rasuwagadhi and Gyirong Port, then roared down the Bhote Koshi and Trishuli through Timure, Syabrubesi and Betrawati. At Galchhi, about 100 kilometres downstream, the river rose around nine metres within half an hour. Bodies were later recovered as far away as Chitwan and Nawalparasi, which tells its own story about the reach of the flood. Nepal’s disaster authority classified two districts, Rasuwa and Nuwakot, as severely affected and put the number of people impacted at roughly 1.6 million. The

NEIGHBOURHOODNOVEMBER 3, 2026

The Myanmar Vortex: Why India Can No Longer Ignore Its Burning Frontier

Author: Hridbina Chatterjee | Research Associate The contemporary geopolitical architecture of South and Southeast Asia is increasingly defined by the deep institutional fractures running through Myanmar’s political landscape. Ever since the momentous political realignment and subsequent state collapse following the 2021 military takeover, Myanmar has struggled to function as a coherent centralized entity capable of exercising sovereign authority over its distant peripheries. For New Delhi, this progressive disintegration of governance in regions immediately adjacent to India’s northeastern frontier has transformed what was historically a manageable, porous border into a highly volatile security vector. The continuous armed confrontations involving the central military apparatus, ethnic armed groups, and newly emerging local defense militias have created an expansive administrative void along the international frontier. This chaotic environment directly challenges the long-term strategic stability of India’s eastern gateway, forcing national security planners to re-evaluate how internal stability across states like Manipur, Nagaland, Mizoram, and Arunachal Pradesh remains intrinsically bound to the deep structural turmoil unfolding across the eastern line. Underneath the visible dynamics of localized civil strife lies a complex matrix of foreign maneuvering and strategic posturing that threatens to destabilize the broader subregion. For decades, foreign policy scholars and defense analysts have tracked the subtle yet persistent presence of foreign interference designed to keep India’s eastern flank perpetually occupied and unsettled. The strategic geographic layout of Northeast India—connected to the Indian heartland via the narrow Siliguri Corridor—has long been viewed by hostile external interests as an operational pressure point. By exploiting historic local grievances, transborder ethnic affiliations, and difficult, densely forested terrain, external actors have periodically found fertile soil to nurture covert instability. Understanding this fluid security landscape requires looking beyond isolated insurgent encounters, focusing instead on how regional proxy dynamics and great-power rivalries converge to exploit Myanmar’s ongoing administrative collapse. The Geography of Anarchy and Safe Haven Dynamics The profound territorial fragmentation within Myanmar, particularly across contiguous zones in Sagaing Region, Chin State, and the Kachin hills, has inadvertently revived operational spaces for anti-India insurgent formations. In previous years, sustained bilateral counter-insurgency coordination and joint security frameworks maintained under official diplomatic protocols, such as formal security agreements administered through the Ministry of External Affairs, worked effectively to compress underground outfits and dismantle their forward infrastructure. However, the battlefield reversals suffered by central authorities inside Myanmar have enabled various insurgent factions—including elements of the United Liberation Front of Asom, the People’s Liberation Army of Manipur, and factions of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland—to re-establish secure staging grounds, logistics bases, and training encampments in unpoliced border pockets across the international boundary. This revival of cross-border safe havens is rendered significantly more dangerous by the influx of advanced military hardware, commercial technological adaptations, and modern communication tools into non-state hands. The widespread availability of weaponized commercial drones, satellite communication arrays, and sophisticated automatic weaponry across conflict zones in Myanmar has inevitably spilled over into the inventory of insurgent syndicates operating near the Indian line. These technological developments raise the operational risks faced by border guarding forces deployed under the authority of the Ministry of Home Affairs, fundamentally changing the tactical nature of asymmetric warfare along the frontier. Furthermore, the deliberate exploitation of transborder cultural affiliations—spanning communities across both sides of the official border—allows armed operatives to blend seamlessly into civilian movements, posing severe obstacles to real-time intelligence gathering and targeted kinetic interdiction. The External Footprint and Proxy Maneuvering A comprehensive analysis of the security risks emanating from Myanmar must address the pervasive influence of foreign powers seeking to balance or contain India’s expanding geopolitical presence. Chief among these external influences is the calculated strategic maneuvering of Beijing, whose economic and infrastructural ambitions in Myanmar are institutionalized through major initiatives like the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor. While official diplomatic narratives emphasize regional connectivity and trade development, ground realities in northern and western Myanmar demonstrate a persistent pattern of foreign engagement with various ethnic armed groups operating close to Indian borders. By maintaining active channels of communication, economic links, and informal leverage with groups controlling key border nodes, foreign intelligence networks retain the capability to calibrate security pressure along India’s perimeter. This covert external backing manifests through clandestine supply networks, financial flows, and logistical arrangements that prevent the total neutralization of anti-India underground networks. The underlying strategic goal behind such engineered friction is clear: to force New Delhi to lock down significant military, intelligence, and financial capital within domestic border defense frameworks, thereby constraining India’s capacity to project power seamlessly into the broader Indo-Pacific domain. Recognizing these external levers is essential for preserving an independent, sovereign security posture. India’s strategic community has consistently rejected external interference or third-party doctrines that aim to dictate its regional alignments, maintaining a firm policy of addressing internal borderland challenges purely through national resolve, strong defense posture, and constructive sovereign diplomacy. The Domestic Fallout and the Narco-Terror Nexus The operational collapse of state authority within Myanmar bleeds directly into the socio-economic and security fabric of Northeast India, generating complex domestic crises that go far beyond standard border management. Primary among these internal challenges is the dramatic expansion of the illicit drug trade emanating from the Golden Triangle, whose transnational distribution networks routinely penetrate Indian territory through unmonitored jungle tracks. The production and smuggling of synthetic narcotics, high-grade heroin, and precursor chemicals produce massive illegal revenues that directly finance insurgent weapons procurement, gang recruitment, and local underground networks. This lethal synthesis of drug trafficking and armed insurgency creates a self-funding shadow economy that corrodes local communities, corrupts administrative mechanisms, and generates chronic lawlessness in border zones. Compounding this transnational crime nexus is the intense humanitarian pressure caused by displaced populations fleeing aerial strikes and heavy ground combat in western Myanmar. While humanitarian considerations necessitate empathetic handling and temporary shelter—particularly in border states like Mizoram and Manipur that share deep historical and familial ties with displaced populations—uncontrolled demographic inflows generate profound socio-political anxieties and overstretch local administrative resources. Underground insurgent groups frequently take advantage of these unmonitored human movements to insert covert operatives,

Hridbina ChatterjeeResearch Analyst

NEIGHBOURHOODNOVEMBER 3, 2026

Balancing the Scales: Human Rights, Opposition Dynamics, and the Future of Bangladesh

Author: Hridbina Chatterjee | Research Associate The socio-political landscape of Bangladesh has long been defined by an intense, existential competition between its two principal political foundations: the Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party. Deeply rooted in the defining struggles of the 1971 Liberation War, the Awami League has traditionally presented itself as the essential custodian of secular Bengali nationalism, constitutional continuity, and sovereignty. Over several decades of active governance and structural consolidation, the party constructed extensive linkages across key domestic institutions, bureaucratic mechanisms, civil society organizations, and international geopolitical corridors. However, this foundational historical mandate has continually collided with complex realpolitik challenges, resulting in profound structural transformations whenever administrative power shifts hands in Dhaka. To understand the current direction of Bangladesh, it is imperative to consider how state power, social memory, and governance interact with each other within a very volatile internal environment. The political context of the country has provided very little space for any sort of political compromise without any participation in the action by outside forces. This rigidity of the political situation has effectively forced the biggest political parties to create very effective networks of exiles, think tanks, and diaspora groups across all major capitals in the Western world. Those networks have become important tools for political survival, lobbying, and diplomacy in situations of limited space for political action and operation at home that can be imagined. Bangladesh’s modern political architecture has been characterized by an ongoing cycle of speedy economic mobilization along with long-standing institutional conflict. On the one hand, the Awami League eras witnessed important economic development, major infrastructure projects, and an increase in regional integration. On the other hand, these processes were accompanied by enormous disputes about the integrity of electoral processes and accountability of the public sector. In order to understand these processes, one must analyze how the historical context, party loyalty, and institutional mechanisms shape Bangladesh’s development. Dynamics of the Diaspora and International Advocacy Networks The Bangladeshi diaspora living in Western countries has seen substantial change, developing well beyond its previous role of simply being a passive provider of foreign remittances towards becoming an active and organized political actor. The diaspora networks, professional organizations, and intellectual communities in the United States, the United Kingdom, and continental Europe are seen today as key diplomats and communicators for political leadership. When domestic political channels encounter legal pressures, administrative curbs, or state scrutiny, these international networks step in to sustain political discourse, arrange high-level policy discussions, and maintain party visibility before the global community. By continuously engaging with former cabinet ministers, economic experts, scholarly authors and others in the field of international law and economics in traditional Western policy circles, the expatriate networks seek to create stability, develop policy positions and advocate for the concept of democracy restoration. This international gathering serves to reiterate the postulate that the platform of the Awami League is crucial for security and economic stability of South Asia. Through continuous communication with foreign government institutions, parliamentary committees, and various international think tanks, diaspora leaders make sure that their vision is present in global discussions about the governance in South Asia. In addition, these advocacy groups of diaspora play a unique role in counteracting unilateral political narratives. By organizing international fora, briefings, and academic discussions diaspora groups achieve the aim of closing the gap between the real situation inside the country and international interpretation of it. The nature of such modern world involvement in formal political discourse emphasizes that Bangladesh’s political struggle is no longer constrained by the nation’s borders. Furthermore, these overseas advocacy networks play an indispensable role in counteracting unilateral political narratives. By coordinating international symposia, policy briefings, and academic roundtables, diaspora organizers bridge the information gap between domestic realities and international policy perception. The sophisticated nature of this modern global engagement underscores that Bangladeshi political struggles are no longer confined within national borders; they are actively deliberated, debated, and navigated across international policy centers in Washington, London, Brussels, and Geneva. Balancing Party Narratives and Human Rights Realities Any wide-ranging and nuanced political evaluation of Bangladesh has to deal with the important issue of human rights violations, which have plagued the country through many administrations. After several years in power with constant scrutiny by international watchdogs over issues such as freedom of expression and independence of the media, as well as the executive interference with civil institutions and prohibition of opposition meetings, a number of international human rights organizations, such as Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and U.S. Department of State Human Rights Bureau, have repeatedly pointed out systemic weaknesses in the functioning of state mechanisms and have described violations of laws regarding national security, holding people in custody prior to trial for a long period, as well as extrajudicial methods used by the law enforcement agencies. The incorporation of the indicated practices of human rights monitoring into analytical framework is of utmost importance to ensure analytical credibility. In spite of the fact that the representatives of political parties and politicians point out achievements regarding the economy, industry, security, and poverty reduction, the analysis would reveal that good achievements do not free the country from the necessity of holding decent elections. The interplay between maintaining internal security and respecting fundamental freedoms remains a core challenge for Bangladeshi governance. Broad anti-terrorism provisions and digital security statutes, while defended by state authorities as necessary tools against radicalization and disinformation, have frequently drawn sharp criticism from groups like Freedom House for their potential to stifle constructive dissent and journalistic inquiry. Acknowledging these complex institutional realities allows international observers to construct a nuanced framework that evaluates both administrative achievements and the imperative for comprehensive human rights compliance. Re-evaluating the Opposition and the Role of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party A realistic, objective analysis of the Bangladeshi political matrix cannot disregard or summarily dismiss the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, which continues to command substantial popular support across urban centers and rural heartlands alike. Grounded

Hridbina ChatterjeeResearch Analyst

CHINAOCTOBER 16, 2026

How Chinese Activities Ecologically Impact Tibet and Downstream Regions

Executive Summary The Tibetan Plateau is the single most important source of fresh water in Asia. The Indus, Sutlej, Karnali, Gandaki, Koshi, Brahmaputra, Salween, Mekong, Yangtze and Yellow rivers all begin in its glaciers, snowfields, springs and high wetlands, and together they sustain well over a billion people across South, Southeast and East Asia. Since the People’s Republic of China took control of Tibet in 1950, this landscape has been treated less as a shared ecological commons and more as a frontier to be secured, engineered and extracted. Over the past two decades the pace of that transformation has accelerated sharply. Mainstream dams on the Yarlung Tsangpo, a mega hydropower project at the Great Bend in Medog, highways and railways driven through unstable valleys, fortified border settlements, expanding mining, the forced sedentarisation of nomads, and even large-scale attempts to modify the weather over the Plateau have all been pursued by Beijing with little transparency and almost no consultation with downstream countries. This report examines those activities against the background of the catastrophic flood of 26 August 2026, which tore through the Lhende Khola, Bhote Koshi and Trishuli corridors on the Nepal-Tibet border. By the end of September, Nepal Police were reporting 1,452 confirmed dead and 5,132 people listed as missing, while on the Chinese side Xinhua has held Tibet’s toll at 43 dead with 519 missing since 6 September. Hydropower plants, the Rasuwagadhi and Gyirong border crossings, dozens of bridges and long stretches of highway were wiped out, and Nepal’s Finance Minister estimated reconstruction costs at US$4 to 5 billion, close to a tenth of the national economy. The scientific consensus now places the trigger of the 2026 collapse on the Nepali flank of Langtang Lirung, and this report does not claim that any single Chinese project caused it. The disaster matters for a different reason. It came just thirteen months after the July 2025 flood that did originate in Tibet, from a supraglacial lake on the Purepu Glacier in Gyirong County, and it fits a long pattern of transboundary cryosphere disasters descending from the Plateau. More importantly, it exposed how little the downstream states know about what is happening upstream, how badly exposed critical infrastructure has been sited in the flood path, and how Beijing continues to treat hydrological and environmental information as a strategic asset rather than a humanitarian obligation. The central argument of this report is that Chinese policy on the Plateau is steadily raising the ecological risk carried by Tibetans and by the people of Nepal, India, Bangladesh and Bhutan, while denying them the information and voice they need to protect themselves. The report closes with a set of practical recommendations for downstream governments, regional bodies and the wider international community. Introduction: The Water Tower Under Management The Plateau is often called the Third Pole because it holds the largest store of ice outside the polar regions. It is also warming faster than most of the planet. Assessments of the Hindu Kush Himalaya have found that glaciers in the region disappeared 65 percent faster in the 2010s than in the the preceding decade, and that on current emissions pathways as much as 80 percent of present glacier volume could be gone by the end of the century. Even if warming is held below 2°C, a loss of roughly a third to a half of the ice is projected. More recent observations show that ice loss rates across the region have roughly doubled since 2000. Climate change is a global problem, and China alone cannot be blamed for it. But how a state manages a warming mountain system is very much a national choice. A government that recognised the fragility of the Plateau would slow down, map its hazards openly, share its data freely, and involve both local Tibetan communities and downstream neighbours in decisions about large projects. Beijing has done almost the opposite. It has treated the Plateau as an engine for national energy supply, a buffer for territorial security and a laboratory for top-down environmental engineering. Tibetans have had little say in any of this, and countries downstream have had even less. The consequences of this approach are visible at three levels. On the Plateau itself, rivers, wetlands, grasslands and pastoral communities have been reshaped by dams, drainage, mining and resettlement. Along the Himalayan border, construction for trade and military access has pushed roads, ports and settlements into narrow valleys exposed to floods and slope failures. And downstream, in Nepal, India and Bangladesh, people living along glacier-fed rivers face growing hazards with less and less warning. The August 2026 Flood: What Happened At about 8:37 in the morning on 26 August 2026, a very large slab of fractured rock and glacier ice broke away from the north face of Langtang Lirung, a peak of over 7,200 metres close to the border. The mass fell roughly 1,200 metres into the valley of the Lhende Khola, the stream that marks the boundary between Nepal’s Rasuwa district and Gyirong County in Tibet. It shattered into a mixture of pulverised rock, ice and meltwater, picked up loose sediment from a channel that had already been stripped and widened by the previous year’s flood, and became a debris flow of extraordinary speed. The energy released was strong enough to register on seismometers in the United States and Germany as the equivalent of a magnitude 5 earthquake, and early reports did in fact describe it as a quake. The surge smashed into the confluence at Rasuwagadhi and Gyirong Port, then roared down the Bhote Koshi and Trishuli through Timure, Syabrubesi and Betrawati. At Galchhi, about 100 kilometres downstream, the river rose around nine metres within half an hour. Bodies were later recovered as far away as Chitwan and Nawalparasi, which tells its own story about the reach of the flood. Nepal’s disaster authority classified two districts, Rasuwa and Nuwakot, as severely affected and put the number of people impacted at roughly 1.6 million. The damage to infrastructure was immense. Around

AdminResearch Analyst

UNTRADITIONAL SECURITYOCTOBER 13, 2026

Why Calls to Revive SAARC Are About More Than Regional Cooperation

Why Calls to Revive SAARC Are About More Than Regional Cooperation Geopolitical positioning, institutional paralysis and the case for practical South Asian cooperation Rationale Founded in Dhaka in December 1985, SAARC brings together Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Its charter seeks to improve living standards, accelerate economic and social development, and strengthen collective self-reliance. Yet the organisation’s last summit was held in Kathmandu in November 2014. The 2016 Islamabad summit did not take place amid deteriorating India–Pakistan relations and the withdrawal of several participating states from the process. The result has been a prolonged institutional freeze, even as cross-border problems have become harder to manage in isolation. [1][2] The article notes call from Bangladesh and Maldives for SAARC to return to the negotiating table, alongside support for renewed regional engagement from Nepal and Bhutan. Bangladesh has also argued that SAARC and the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) should work alongside one another rather than be treated as alternatives. Such statements matter, but a call for revival is not the same as an agreed roadmap, and neither necessarily indicates a willingness to resolve the political disputes that have paralysed the organisation. 1. The central obstacle is political, not merely administrative SAARC’s institutional design makes political goodwill indispensable. Article X of its charter requires decisions at every level to be unanimous and excludes bilateral and contentious issues from deliberations. The exclusion was intended to protect regional cooperation from being overwhelmed by disputes between neighbours. In practice, however, the combination of unanimity and deep bilateral mistrust has made it difficult to move forward when even one member is unwilling to participate. [1] This is the organisation’s central paradox: SAARC is designed to keep contentious disputes outside the room, but those disputes can determine whether the room is convened at all. India–Pakistan tensions have repeatedly obstructed summit-level engagement, while the deterioration of Pakistan–Afghanistan relations adds another layer of friction. The consequences are not confined to diplomacy. When leaders cannot meet, it becomes harder to secure political direction, approve ambitious initiatives and reassure officials that cross-border projects will survive the next crisis. Still, it would be too simple to attribute SAARC’s paralysis exclusively to one bilateral relationship. The consensus rule gives every member a veto, and weak implementation, limited institutional resources, uneven political commitment and low levels of regional economic interdependence have also constrained the organisation. A serious revival therefore requires more than a summit announcement. It requires a minimum political understanding that technical cooperation should continue even when high-level relations are strained. 2. Regionalism is also a tool of geopolitical balancing Smaller South Asian states do not make foreign-policy choices in a vacuum. They seek investment, infrastructure, security partnerships, market access and diplomatic support from multiple partners. China’s economic presence, the continuing importance of the United States, ties with Gulf countries and links with Southeast Asia all shape the choices available to governments across the region. Building such relationships is not, by itself, evidence of disloyalty to South Asian cooperation. It is a normal form of strategic diversification. The geopolitical question is how governments use these relationships. A renewed appeal to SAARC can help a state demonstrate that it wants a voice in regional affairs, avoid being seen as dependent on a single partner, or signal dissatisfaction with the limits of existing bilateral arrangements. It may also be a way of reminding India, the region’s largest economy and most geographically central state, that neighbouring countries value multilateral forums in which they can participate on a more formally equal footing. Bangladesh’s and Maldives’ efforts to deepen relationships beyond India illustrate the wider strategic setting described in the original draft. Chinese-backed infrastructure, potential security partnerships and engagement with Gulf states can expand policy options for these governments. But the inference must be handled carefully: external partnerships do not prove that calls for SAARC are insincere. A more defensible conclusion is that regional cooperation and geopolitical hedging can occur simultaneously. The real test is whether governments are prepared to translate their rhetoric into funded programmes, negotiated rules and sustained participation. For India, this creates a strategic dilemma. It may be reluctant to invest political capital in a forum where progress can be blocked and bilateral disputes may dominate the agenda. At the same time, prolonged disengagement can leave neighbouring states with fewer region-wide channels and make alternative groupings or external partners more attractive. A regional institution that is unable to deliver results can weaken India’s influence; an institution that works predictably could instead reinforce India’s role as a provider of regional public goods. 3. The economic case for cooperation remains compelling The weakness of SAARC is particularly striking when measured against the economic opportunities available to South Asia. The World Bank reports that intra-regional trade accounts for only about 5 per cent of South Asia’s total trade, compared with roughly 25 per cent in ASEAN. It estimates current trade among South Asian economies at around US$23 billion, well below an estimated potential of at least US$67 billion. High tariffs, non-tariff barriers, restrictions on investment, poor transport links and a persistent trust deficit all contribute to this gap. [3] These figures suggest that the region’s problem is not a lack of economic logic. It is the failure to convert geographical proximity into lower costs and dependable connections. Businesses can face more expensive and complicated trade with nearby countries than with distant markets. For landlocked Nepal and Bhutan, access to ports and efficient transit routes is especially important. For Bangladesh, improved links with India, Nepal and Bhutan can widen markets and make ports and transport corridors more productive. For India’s border states, regional commerce can support local firms, jobs and supply chains. The South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA), which came into force in 2006, has not delivered the depth of integration originally anticipated. A tariff agreement alone cannot overcome closed or inefficient border crossings, inconsistent standards, weak logistics, payment constraints and political restrictions. Nor can regional

AdminResearch Analyst

CommentariesAUGUST 20, 2026

STATEMENTS · COMMENTARIES · MEDIA

Latest Intelligence Feeds

UPDATED AUGUST 20, 2026607 ANALYSES ON RECORD

Evergrande’s Fall Exposes the Deeper Fault Lines in China’s Property-Led Growth Model

The sentencing of Hui Ka Yan, Xu Jiayin, founder of the China Evergrande Group, to life in prison marks the conclusion of more than just the fall of one of China’s biggest businessmen. Hui was found guilty of eight offenses, including fraud, misappropriation of funds, securities violations, and bribery. Evergrande, formerly the largest real estate developer in China by contracted sales, turned to almost all of its $300 billion plus liabilities. Hui’s trial may mark the end of a significant legal case, but the Evergrande case does not end the massive economic case Evergrande came to represent. China’s real estate bubble was not a tale of just increasing house prices. It involved a tightly connected system of households, developers, banks, and local governments. Property became the main wealth purchasing and saving vehicle for Chinese households. In a survey by the People’s Bank of China, 59.1% of urban households’ assets were held in the form of housing, and the home ownership rate was 96%. Increasing house prices had an effect beyond an increase in construction. House prices had a positive effect on household wealth perceptions, confidence, and consumption. For developers, the system was designed to incentivize expansion. Land was bought and presold apartments, loans made it possible for developers to start new projects, and growing property evaluations enabled more borrowing. Evergrande was one of the developers who pushed the system the farthest. It can be described as the “three highs” consisting of high turnover, high costs, and high leverage. Evergrande’s model was to raise capital, buy land on a massive scale, and begin development while also borrowing against their land and starting the cycle over. So long as lenders continued to lend and buyers continued to buy, investors and developers alike continued to benefit from the cycle and the land and housing prices continued to grow. Local government interests were aligned with the developers. After the 1994 tax-sharing reform, the central government gained more revenue, leaving local governments shouldering a greater financial burden. To offset some of the burden, local governments sold land to developers and used land as collateral for loans. By 2019, it is calculated that local governments’ reliance on land finance was at 38.6 percent, with over 50 percent in many large cities. Property prices and local government finance and debt fuelled a cycle of increasing infrastructure spending. This outlines how vital property investment became for China. The IMF put the contribution of property to the economy at up to 20 percent. However, this number does not even come close to capturing the extent of property’s reach. Building property creates the need for the transport of raw materials. That includes steel, cement, and glass, as well as the machines to build the property, appliances, and furniture. Glass and machinery need to be transported using logistics and financial services. Property building employs contractors. Developers take out mortgages and corporate loans. Local governments earn money from the sale of land. So, property not only includes one of many sectors of the economy, but becomes a complete economic system. It becomes very clear how this system would collapse if the opposite of what is expected were to occur. This is the nature of a bubble. Every apartment does not become worthless. It means that the cost of the property, along with construction and the loans used to finance the purchase, became more dependent on whether people thought the price and demand for property would continue to rise. If people begin to think the cost of property will fall, then the same thing happens in the opposite order. Buyers will delay purchases, developers will not earn presale income, government revenue will fall, and banks will be more cautious of extending loans. Beijing recognized the risks so they began to tighten financial regulations starting in 2016. In 2020, The “Three Red Lines” Framework was established. Beijing’s goal was to limit debt for highly leveraged developers. From a macroeconomic standpoint it was necessary to limit debt. The problem was that leverage had become endemic throughout the system. It was really wishful thinking that it would discipline poorly managed developers because it made the business models of other driven companies more dependent on constantly selling new property and taking out new loans to continuously refinance debt. Evergrande exemplified the most famous case of China’s real estate collapse. Their failure impacted far more than themselves. Suppliers weren’t getting paid, construction companies went bankrupt and halted their projects, buyers had to wait to get their newly financed homes, and the creditors began to doubt the feasibility of their investments. Media states that Evergrande’s liquidation is slow and only $255 million of assets were sold by August of 2025 with claims against those assets totalling $45 billion. The possibility of China suffering a sudden replication of America’s 2008 “Lehman moment” is low. China’s financial system is more state-controlled, and the major banks are capable of being directed to provide support. Further, the capacity of Beijing to avoid excessive failure is far higher than the capacity of America at that same part in its history. The more likely threat is a prolonged balance-sheet adjustment where weakness in the property market will slow economic activity for many years. This trend continues through 2026. In July, Chinese new-home prices fell by 3.2% compared to the previous year. Of the 70 cities monitored, only 17 showed an increase in prices from the previous month. The first 7 months of the year also showed declining trends in property sales, investment, and new construction. During this period, the revenue of the Chinese government from land sales declined by 31.5% and was recorded at 977.8 billion yuan. These figures show a weakening trend in property and reflect declining private investment and local government finances. This trend is most problematic for households. When the primary investment of a household falls in value, households become more conservative. Household wealth falls and household members that own houses feel poorer, even if they have no intention of selling.

Media CoverageAUGUST 20, 2026

India’s Call for Transparency in UNSC Terror Listings Deserves Global Support

20th August 2026 Red Lantern Analytica welcomes and fully endorses India’s plea for increased UN Security Council transparency, objectivity, and accountability while addressing the challenge of listing and delisting terrorism-related persons and entities. India has brought a legitimate concern to the UN that has eroded the international community’s confidence in its counter-terrorism efforts. The member states of the UN cannot decide on terrorism through geopolitical convenience or the interpretation and consideration of terrorism in a selective manner. India also does not appreciate the fact that certain U.N. member states consider certain political individuals and groups as useful. The reality is that a terrorist who is a threat to one country cannot be treated differently from the terrorist who is a threat to another country. India has good reason to question the UN’s ability to respond to the threats it faces given India’s efforts to bring international sanctions against terrorists based in Pakistan and related to attacks on India. The obstructive behaviour of the UN Security Council has, on several occasions, created barriers to India’s efforts to respond to terrorism. China has used technical holds to obstruct proposals targeting Pakistan-based terrorists, including the head of the Jaish-e-Mohammed, Masood Azhar. This demonstrates that the international community cannot demand collective efforts to meet counter-terrorism goals while also ensuring that obstruction and opacity characterize the most important of the international community’s security efforts. The counter-terrorism efforts of the international community are not possible while countries continue to employ political considerations that are incompatible with counter-terrorism to provide indirect protection for terrorists, their financiers, and their supporters. The objections, requests for delisting, and holds must each be substantiated with reasons. The Security Council should never become a political arm of efforts to protect terrorists and those who support them financially. Red Lantern Analytica additionally advocates for comprehensive reform of the Security Council pertaining to the demands of the Indian government. The security structures and systems created post-World War II will not last forever. The UN has continued to grow, and there are now more emerging markets and centres. The Global South is also more important than ever before. This all further demonstrates the need for multi-faceted reform. India’s position for all categories, permanent and non-permanent, of expansion, as well as representation for developing nations and progress through negotiations, is legitimate and should be recognized internationally. The Security Council must focus on the present day and thus respond to the needs of the time and offer accountability and representation, as legitimate structures of the modern world order. India continues to support UN peacekeeping and international counter-terrorism efforts. It is therefore important for India that the Security Council responds to the challenges of the 21st century, and not just meet India’s request for representation. It is about the integrity of the UN as a whole. There can be no double standards on terrorism. Political expediency must never provide a shield for terrorists or their support networks. A strengthened UN should defeat terrorism and protect the people of the world.

StatementsAUGUST 10, 2026

Statement on China’s Attempts to Reinforce Territorial Claims in Arunachal Pradesh

Red Lantern Analytica strongly condemns the latest attempt to challenge India’s territorial sovereignty through the arbitrary renaming of locations in Arunachal Pradesh. Such unilateral actions cannot alter established ground realities or confer legitimacy upon territorial claims. The repeated use of administrative nomenclature and cartographic exercises to advance contested claims is deeply concerning and risks further complicating efforts to maintain stability and mutual understanding along the India–China boundary. India has consistently rejected these attempts and affirmed that Arunachal Pradesh is an integral and inalienable part of India. We believe that territorial disputes must be addressed through established diplomatic mechanisms, dialogue, and respect for existing agreements, rather than through unilateral measures intended to reinforce contested narratives. At a time when India and China have sought to manage tensions and preserve channels of engagement, actions that unnecessarily inflame territorial sensitivities are counterproductive to regional stability.

Media CoverageAUGUST 3, 2026

Red Lantern Analytica Releases Report on Chinese Cyber-Enabled Narrative Operations

New Delhi, August 2, 2026: Red Lantern Analytica organised a discussion and report-release event titled “Chinese Cyber-Enabled Narrative Operations”, bringing together experts in China studies, cybersecurity, information warfare and strategic affairs to examine the growing use of digital platforms for influencing public opinion and weakening confidence in democratic institutions. The event also marked the release of Red Lantern Analytica’s report, “Chinese Cyber-Enabled Narrative Operations Around India’s 2026 Student Protest.” The study examines how domestic protests and public grievances in India were reframed across Chinese-language and international digital platforms as evidence of governance failure, institutional decline and political instability. The discussion featured Professor Sriparna Pathak, Professor of China Studies and Founding Director of the Centre for Northeast Asian Studies at O.P. Jindal Global University; Dr Madhukar Shyam, Assistant Professor in the Department of International Studies, Political Science and History at CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Delhi NCR; and Mohit Vashish, Founder and Executive Director of Intelligence at the Centre for New Age Warfare Studies. Opening the discussion, Professor Sriparna Pathak said Chinese narrative operations extend beyond attempts to influence elections or promote favourable perceptions of China. Their wider objective, she observed, is to polarise societies, amplify existing grievances and gradually undermine public trust in democratic institutions. She explained that such campaigns frequently rely on inauthentic social-media accounts, artificial intelligence-generated content, state-media proxies and fabricated digital personas. Open democratic information systems are particularly vulnerable because foreign narratives can circulate with relatively few restrictions, while China maintains a highly controlled domestic information environment. Professor Pathak noted that India has emerged as both a strategic target and a testing ground for these operations, particularly since the June 2020 Galwan Valley clash. Narratives linked to Chinese digital ecosystems have sought to question India’s military preparedness, intensify ethnic and regional tensions and portray democratic disagreements as evidence of political instability. Referring to campaigns concerning Northeast India, she highlighted attempts to exploit developments in Manipur, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh. Chinese-origin content, sometimes translated or adapted using artificial intelligence tools, has been circulated to amplify separatist claims, distort local grievances and complicate India’s border-management challenges. She also referred to bot-like accounts that sought to undermine confidence in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections by raising doubts about national security, governance and defence capabilities. Professor Pathak called for faster official responses, greater platform transparency, improved public-reporting mechanisms and media-literacy programmes in Indian languages. Dr Madhukar Shyam distinguished conventional cyberattacks from cyber-enabled narrative operations. While technical cyberattacks are designed to penetrate, disrupt or damage computer systems, narrative operations use the digital environment to shape emotions, attitudes and political perceptions. He referred to earlier cyber-espionage campaigns, including the 2009 GhostNet operation, which compromised computer systems across several countries and reportedly targeted institutions connected with the Tibetan community. He also discussed the Shadow in the Cloud investigation and cyberattacks against Tibetan institutions, illustrating the relationship between technical espionage and long-term information warfare. Dr Shyam further examined how Chinese messaging sought to exploit India’s 2024 National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test controversy. Comparisons between China’s Gaokao examination and India’s NEET system were used to present protests and administrative disputes as evidence of systemic democratic failure. Such narratives, he said, deliberately misinterpret public protests, which are a normal feature of democratic accountability, as signs of political collapse and institutional instability. He also drew attention to attempts to manipulate cultural and civilisational narratives, including efforts to weaken India’s historical association with Buddhism and create differences between India and neighbouring countries. Mohit Vashish explained the operational structure of contemporary Chinese information warfare, describing it as a systems-based approach in which intelligence gathering, psychological profiling, content creation, social-media amplification and influencer engagement operate in coordination. According to Vashish, intelligence agencies and associated organisations first identify societal “fault lines”—issues capable of dividing communities—and then use psychological techniques to intensify those divisions. Anonymous posts may initially be amplified through bot networks and subsequently repeated by influencers, media platforms or political commentators, giving manufactured narratives an appearance of credibility and organic public support. He also warned that foreign-linked entities may approach students, researchers and young professionals through professional networking platforms such as LinkedIn. Individuals studying defence, international relations, security and political science may be offered unusually high payments for reports or research assignments. Vashish advised students and researchers to verify email addresses, carefully examine domain-name spellings, check the organisation’s official website and remain cautious about unsolicited financial offers. He also recommended reviewing suspicious accounts’ biographies, posting histories and interaction patterns, tracing the earliest appearance of particular phrases and conducting reverse-image searches before sharing sensational content. Presenting the findings of the report, Daney Antonio Martin of Red Lantern Analytica said the research examined content circulated through Chinese and international platforms, including WeChat, Weibo, Guancha and X. The report found no evidence that China initiated India’s 2026 student protests. It nevertheless identified strong evidence that Chinese digital ecosystems exploited and amplified the protests to advance broader geopolitical narratives about India. The study distinguishes between direct instigation and narrative exploitation. It assesses the evidence for coordinated amplification as substantially stronger than any claim of centrally directed technical interference in the protests. The speakers agreed that foreign narrative operations cannot be addressed solely through government regulation or technical cybersecurity measures. They called for a whole-of-society approach involving government agencies, digital platforms, researchers, educational institutions, journalists, civil-society organisations and citizens. The discussion underlined the need for rapid public communication, transparent platform practices, stronger verification systems and greater digital awareness among users. Participants also emphasised that democratic openness should not become a vulnerability that foreign actors can repeatedly exploit. The session concluded with a vote of thanks to the speakers, moderator, participants and organising team for contributing to the discussion on safeguarding India’s information environment. About Red Lantern Analytica Red Lantern Analytica is a New Delhi-based international observers and research organisation working on China, Tibet, the Indo-Pacific, cybersecurity, disinformation, strategic affairs and emerging geopolitical challenges. Through research reports, expert dialogues and public engagement, it seeks to promote informed debate and policy-oriented analysis.

CommentariesJULY 25, 2026

𝐀 𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐇𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 – 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐯𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲: 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐍𝐒𝐂𝐍 (𝐈𝐌) & 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐌𝐲𝐚𝐧𝐦𝐚𝐫

N𝐞𝐰 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 | 𝐑𝐞𝐝 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐀𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚 Red Lantern Analytica presents a new strategic analysis: “𝐀 𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐇𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 – 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐯𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲: 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐍𝐒𝐂𝐍 (𝐈𝐌) & 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐌𝐲𝐚𝐧𝐦𝐚𝐫.” Authored by Lt. Col. Ujjual Abhishek Jha, DCPP (Retd.), this examines the recent organisational split within NSCN (IM), the emergence of the Eastern Flank-led Provisional Government, and its implications for the Naga peace process, cross-border insurgency, and India’s security landscape in the Northeast. Download Link: A Divided House Legacy vs Reality Fracture in NSCM-IM and Rise of the Rival Provisional Government in Myanmar

Browse all publicationsarrow_outward

Research DesksANALYSES PUBLISHED

208Nuclear Issues 110Radicalisation 83Media Coverage 74Afghanistan 69Untraditional Security 29Commentaries

BROWSE BY REGION

Explore all 14 research desks

Afghanistan Asia China West Asia

Strategic Gallery

India’s Call for Transparency in UNSC Terror Listings Deserves Global Support

Myanmar at a Crossroad: Mapping Political Evolution & Future Pathways

Europe Without Russian Energy

Statement on China’s Attempts to Reinforce Territorial Claims in Arunachal Pradesh

Importance of India and East Asia Cooperation in Higher Education, Research and Development, and the Skilling of Labour

UAE’s Exit from OPEC: Strategic Sovereignty, Energy Transition, and the Future of Global Oil Governance

Red Lantern Analytica Releases Report on Chinese Cyber-Enabled Narrative Operations

Chinese Cyber-Enabled Narrative Operations Around India’s 2026 Student Protests

EXTERNAL RECOGNITION

Media Coverage & Multilateral Citations

All Coveragearrow_outward

MEDIA COVERAGEAUGUST 20, 2026

India’s Call for Transparency in UNSC Terror Listings Deserves Global Support

MEDIA COVERAGEverified

MEDIA COVERAGEAUGUST 3, 2026

Red Lantern Analytica Releases Report on Chinese Cyber-Enabled Narrative Operations

MEDIA COVERAGEverified

MEDIA COVERAGEMARCH 14, 2026

Press Release: Strategic Dialogue Examining Shifting Power Dynamics

Strategic Dialogue Examining Shifting Power Dynamics in the Indo-Pacific Red Lantern Analytica, in collaboration with Hegemoniq, convened a strategic dialogue on “Strategic Shifts in the Indo-Pacific: Connectivity, Coalitions and Great Power Competition” on 14th March 2026 (Saturday). The discussion brought together distinguished experts to examine the evolving geopolitical architecture of the Indo-Pacific and the implications of growing strategic competition, emerging partnerships, and regional security dynamics. The panel featured Col. Nalin Herath RSP (Retd.) , Amb. Tom Armbruster (Retd.) , Dr. Dattesh Parulekar, and Dr. Rahul Mishra, each offering perspectives on how regional states and major powers are navigating the rapidly changing strategic environment. Speaking from a Sri Lankan perspective, Col. Nalin Herath RSP (Retd.), Amry Veteran & Former Military Spokesperson, Sri Lanka, highlighted the growing importance of the Indian Ocean within the broader Indo-Pacific framework. He emphasized Sri Lanka’s strategic location along critical maritime trade routes connecting East Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. This positioning provides both opportunities and challenges for smaller states. While infrastructure development and connectivity initiatives—particularly port development and maritime logistics—offer avenues for economic growth, they also place Sri Lanka at the intersection of competing geopolitical interests. Col. Herath stressed the importance of balanced diplomacy and Sri Lanka’s traditional policy of non-alignment in navigating great power competition. Maintaining neutrality while engaging multiple partners, he noted, remains essential for ensuring stability and safeguarding national interests. Amb. Tom Armbruster (Retd.), Former US Ambassador to Marshall Islands focused on the role of Pacific Island states within the Indo-Pacific strategic landscape. He challenged the conventional perception of these countries as “small island states,” noting that they instead consider themselves “large ocean countries” due to their vast maritime territories. Despite relatively small populations, these nations wield significant diplomatic influence, particularly in global forums such as the United Nations. Amb. Armbruster highlighted that the primary concerns of Pacific Island states are not great power rivalry but rather climate change, sea-level rise, disaster preparedness, and sustainable development. He also pointed to the growing competition between the United States and China in the Pacific region, while emphasizing that meaningful engagement with island states must prioritize development partnerships, environmental resilience, and long-term economic cooperation. Dr. Dattesh Parulekar, Assistant Professor, School of International & Area Studies, Goa University examined China’s evolving maritime strategy and its impact on Southeast Asia, particularly in the South China Sea. He traced the evolution of China’s maritime ambitions from its 2012 declaration to become a maritime power to its current efforts to assert comprehensive national power in its near seas. Dr. Parulekar argued that China is attempting to redefine maritime norms by combining military capabilities with industrial, technological, and economic instruments. Through infrastructure projects, maritime development initiatives, and blue economy frameworks, Beijing is reshaping regional connectivity and strategic influence. At the same time, Southeast Asian states are adopting different strategies to manage China’s rise. Countries such as Vietnam pursue proactive balancing, Indonesia follows a calibrated approach combining economic engagement with strategic caution, while the Philippines has taken a more assertive stance in defending its maritime claims. These diverse responses illustrate the complex regional dynamics shaping the South China Sea. Providing a broader geopolitical assessment, Dr. Rahul Mishra, Associate Professor, Centre for Indo-Pacific Studies, SIS, JNU, discussed the structural shifts taking place within the Indo-Pacific order. He noted that the Indo-Pacific has firmly emerged as a central theater of global geopolitics, reflecting the growing strategic convergence between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. China’s rise as a revisionist power, he argued, has compelled many countries to reconsider their strategic alignments. This has contributed to the rise of flexible partnerships and minilateral groupings such as the Quad, which seek to address regional challenges ranging from maritime security to supply chain resilience.Dr. Mishra also emphasized that recent global crises—including conflicts in Europe and West Asia—demonstrate that the Indo-Pacific cannot be viewed as an isolated strategic space. Developments in other regions continue to influence the balance of power and security dynamics within the Indo-Pacific. In this context, he highlighted India’s approach of strategic autonomy and multi-alignment as a pragmatic framework for navigating complex geopolitical realities while maintaining constructive partnerships across multiple regions. The dialogue underscored that the Indo-Pacific is undergoing a profound transformation driven by shifting power balances, new connectivity initiatives, and evolving security partnerships. As the region becomes increasingly central to global politics, experts emphasized the need for sustained dialogue, cooperative frameworks, and balanced strategies to ensure stability, economic development, and a rules-based regional order.

MEDIA COVERAGEverified

Latest Videos

View Channelopen_in_new

THE WORLD ECHOES - Featuring H.E. Harisoa Lalatiana Accouche and Hosted by Mr. Vanchinathan Y

THE WORLD ECHOES - Featuring H.E. Harisoa Lalatiana Accouche and Hosted by Mr. Vanchinathan Y

THE WORLD ECHOES - Featuring Alexei Podgur and Yonatan Koyfman (IMEConnect)

THE WORLD ECHOES - Featuring Alexei Podgur and Yonatan Koyfman (IMEConnect)

Carpool Diplomacy S1:E2 - A Drive Through the Hermit Kingdom

Carpool Diplomacy S1:E2 - A Drive Through the Hermit Kingdom

THE WORLD ECHOES - Featuring H.E. Diana Mickevičienė and Hosted by Mr. Vanchinathan Y

THE WORLD ECHOES - Featuring H.E. Diana Mickevičienė and Hosted by Mr. Vanchinathan Y