Untraditional SecurityMAY 25, 2024

Press Release of Webinar on “Need For Taiwan’s Inclusion as an Observer in the World Health Organization”

Team Red Lantern Analytica

Directorate of Intelligence

On May 23rd, 2024, Red Lantern Analytica conducted a webinar titled ‘Need for Taiwan’s Inclusion as an Observer in the World Health Organisation.’ The speakers for the session were Li- Chien Chien MD, PhD who is a Director, International Medical Centre, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, I-Lin Hsu, MD PhD who is an Associate Professor, National Cheng Kung University from Taiwan, and our very own author Dr Devender Kumar who is also a South Asian and West Asian Studies Expert.

The session started off with the remarks of India’s Taipei Economic and Cultural Centre (TECC), Deputy Representative Bor-Huei Hsieh. He mentioned how this webinar and more widespread call for inclusion for Taiwan is crucial because the World Health Organisation scheduled the 77^th session of the World Health Assembly under the banner of “All for Health, Health for All” from 27 May to 1 June of 2024. It includes the participation of many significant high-level country representatives but the distressing part is Taiwan is not included in these sessions. Huy Robert shared the history of Taiwan and the relationship between India & Taiwan elaborately. He said, “Although the island is 36,000 sq.km in size and has approximately 24 million population but Taiwan is a crucial to the world as it is 1^st semiconductor producer in the world with 60% world market share and 90% of advanced chips share in manufacturing and secures 2^nd place in the design and products of the same. In regards to medical fields, Taiwan has 14 hospitals with internationalisation with JCI accreditation and secured the 3^rd spot in the world only after the US and Germany.” Despite these exceptional contributions by Taiwan to the international community in healthcare system Taiwan is unable to participate at World Health Organisation Meetings. He added, “Taiwan is known for high quality with low cost treatment in organ transplantation, cardiovascular and assisted reproductive therapy, facial cranial reconstruction treatments and so on.” He mentioned how the kidney and heart transplantation survival rates are higher than the world average for Taiwan. However, it is an immediate call to have the inclusive healthcare global community with Taiwan in World Health Asssembly (WHA) meetings.

Dr Li Chien Chien shared the relationship between India and Taiwan in the recent times. He also mentioned how Taiwan is not allowed in the participation in international conferences like the United Nations which is an “injustice to Taiwan’s 23 million population.” He further stated, “We are treated like a colony and oppressed by hegemony, Taiwan seeks to collaborate with India to enhance mutual understanding in the medical field.” He recollects the significance of the herbal medicine produced in India which is simply essential for the pharmaceutical industry. He also mentioned, “Though Taiwan is a relatively small market and India is a large country, India can assist Taiwan in its goals. Both countries can collaborate on designing, researching, and aiding people in their respective nations.” He suggested that creation of a communication platform for young people in India and Taiwan would facilitate networking and collaboration through a local distributor in R&D. He concluded by noting that India and Taiwan’s bilateral relation would assist in the global market contributions.

The other speaker who also added intriguing data-backed points for the session from Taiwan was Dr.I-Lin Hsu. He presented from the overview of Taiwan’s demographics i.e. total population with a birth rate of 159,063 per year, median age of 44 years, gender ratio is 49% male and 51% female and around 20% of Taiwan’s population is old-aged. Furthermore, he shared the data and leading causes of death separately for males and females with numbers. The infant mortality rate and neonatal mortality rate stand at 44 and 2.8 respectively according to 2019-2022 data. He also mentioned that Taiwan is ranked the 1^st in Healthcare Index by Country (2024) by Numbeo database with 86.0 points compared to the 82.7 for South Korea. He also shared the following aspects-

Healthcare System:

National health expenditure as 6% of GDP as it is covered under the National Health Insurance.
Taiwanese government aims for cost stability while maintaining quality for all citizens in the long-run.
According to 2022, Taiwan has
- 480 hospitals (475 hospitals have widely western medicine in practice while the rest follow the Chinese medicine i.e. Needle Puncture)
- Clinics : 23,000 (11,000 Western, 4,000 Chinese, 7,000 dentistry)
- 172,000 hospital beds (74 beds per 10,000 population)

Competitive Advantages:

PIC/S GMP standards since 2013
Reliable clinical trial sites and infrastructure
Diverse Culture of Innovation
Strong Intellectual Properties Protection
Skilled workforce
Provision of Government subsidies for foreign partnership: Global Innovation Partnership Initiatives.
Amicable towards fundraising and financing

Furthermore, he shared that Taiwan’s six main strengths: High quality, affordability, technology/innovation, patient-oriented service, comprehensive specialties, and leading physicians. With their NHI MediCloud System, Taiwanese share the information so as to reduce the multiple and same tests taken by the patients in different hospitals. The connectivity within Taiwan also strengthens the medical assistance.

Dr. Devendra Kumar discussed the composition of World Health Organisation and shared the rules and regulations of the Observer Status in WHO. He mentioned precisely on how the non-member State can also become an observer of its meetings i.e based on the expertise of the country which makes Taiwan one of the potential and crucial observer at WHA. He said, “Taiwan is the whistleblower and one of the first few countries who mentioned about COVID-19 to the WHO. Precisely the Disease Controller Department of Taiwan has emailed the WHO and the PRC regatding the rise in cases of Pneumonia. However, the false security notions dealt with this situation put the whole human civilisation at risk.” Thus, this provides a substantial need for inclusion of Taiwan in the meetings.

However, the point of contention for the inclusion is only the People’s Republic of China who is suppressing the right of Taiwan. He describes that the revisionist values of Chinese Communist Party led the PRC curbs the right of the sovereign status and also to contain the healthcare system. He said, “Taiwan was earlier part of the assembly but with the replacement of the PRC as the face of China is only for the mainland.” It can be broadly viewed that the membership for WHA meetings is accountability & transparency for Taiwan, this can be well witnessed how Taiwan contributes to the healthcare system in the global community.” In conclusion, Dr. Kumar said, “The warfare has evolved. It’s not just the traditional threats we are facing today, it is the healthcare system that is becoming weaponised.”

The session was ended with Q&A session from the participants and Ms. Kritika from the team of Red Lantern Analytica Red Lantern Analytica delivered the vote of Thanks.

Related Intelligence

UNTRADITIONAL SECURITYOCTOBER 13, 2026

Why Calls to Revive SAARC Are About More Than Regional Cooperation

Why Calls to Revive SAARC Are About More Than Regional Cooperation Geopolitical positioning, institutional paralysis and the case for practical South Asian cooperation Rationale Founded in Dhaka in December 1985, SAARC brings together Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Its charter seeks to improve living standards, accelerate economic and social development, and strengthen collective self-reliance. Yet the organisation’s last summit was held in Kathmandu in November 2014. The 2016 Islamabad summit did not take place amid deteriorating India–Pakistan relations and the withdrawal of several participating states from the process. The result has been a prolonged institutional freeze, even as cross-border problems have become harder to manage in isolation. [1][2] The article notes call from Bangladesh and Maldives for SAARC to return to the negotiating table, alongside support for renewed regional engagement from Nepal and Bhutan. Bangladesh has also argued that SAARC and the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) should work alongside one another rather than be treated as alternatives. Such statements matter, but a call for revival is not the same as an agreed roadmap, and neither necessarily indicates a willingness to resolve the political disputes that have paralysed the organisation. 1. The central obstacle is political, not merely administrative SAARC’s institutional design makes political goodwill indispensable. Article X of its charter requires decisions at every level to be unanimous and excludes bilateral and contentious issues from deliberations. The exclusion was intended to protect regional cooperation from being overwhelmed by disputes between neighbours. In practice, however, the combination of unanimity and deep bilateral mistrust has made it difficult to move forward when even one member is unwilling to participate. [1] This is the organisation’s central paradox: SAARC is designed to keep contentious disputes outside the room, but those disputes can determine whether the room is convened at all. India–Pakistan tensions have repeatedly obstructed summit-level engagement, while the deterioration of Pakistan–Afghanistan relations adds another layer of friction. The consequences are not confined to diplomacy. When leaders cannot meet, it becomes harder to secure political direction, approve ambitious initiatives and reassure officials that cross-border projects will survive the next crisis. Still, it would be too simple to attribute SAARC’s paralysis exclusively to one bilateral relationship. The consensus rule gives every member a veto, and weak implementation, limited institutional resources, uneven political commitment and low levels of regional economic interdependence have also constrained the organisation. A serious revival therefore requires more than a summit announcement. It requires a minimum political understanding that technical cooperation should continue even when high-level relations are strained. 2. Regionalism is also a tool of geopolitical balancing Smaller South Asian states do not make foreign-policy choices in a vacuum. They seek investment, infrastructure, security partnerships, market access and diplomatic support from multiple partners. China’s economic presence, the continuing importance of the United States, ties with Gulf countries and links with Southeast Asia all shape the choices available to governments across the region. Building such relationships is not, by itself, evidence of disloyalty to South Asian cooperation. It is a normal form of strategic diversification. The geopolitical question is how governments use these relationships. A renewed appeal to SAARC can help a state demonstrate that it wants a voice in regional affairs, avoid being seen as dependent on a single partner, or signal dissatisfaction with the limits of existing bilateral arrangements. It may also be a way of reminding India, the region’s largest economy and most geographically central state, that neighbouring countries value multilateral forums in which they can participate on a more formally equal footing. Bangladesh’s and Maldives’ efforts to deepen relationships beyond India illustrate the wider strategic setting described in the original draft. Chinese-backed infrastructure, potential security partnerships and engagement with Gulf states can expand policy options for these governments. But the inference must be handled carefully: external partnerships do not prove that calls for SAARC are insincere. A more defensible conclusion is that regional cooperation and geopolitical hedging can occur simultaneously. The real test is whether governments are prepared to translate their rhetoric into funded programmes, negotiated rules and sustained participation. For India, this creates a strategic dilemma. It may be reluctant to invest political capital in a forum where progress can be blocked and bilateral disputes may dominate the agenda. At the same time, prolonged disengagement can leave neighbouring states with fewer region-wide channels and make alternative groupings or external partners more attractive. A regional institution that is unable to deliver results can weaken India’s influence; an institution that works predictably could instead reinforce India’s role as a provider of regional public goods. 3. The economic case for cooperation remains compelling The weakness of SAARC is particularly striking when measured against the economic opportunities available to South Asia. The World Bank reports that intra-regional trade accounts for only about 5 per cent of South Asia’s total trade, compared with roughly 25 per cent in ASEAN. It estimates current trade among South Asian economies at around US$23 billion, well below an estimated potential of at least US$67 billion. High tariffs, non-tariff barriers, restrictions on investment, poor transport links and a persistent trust deficit all contribute to this gap. [3] These figures suggest that the region’s problem is not a lack of economic logic. It is the failure to convert geographical proximity into lower costs and dependable connections. Businesses can face more expensive and complicated trade with nearby countries than with distant markets. For landlocked Nepal and Bhutan, access to ports and efficient transit routes is especially important. For Bangladesh, improved links with India, Nepal and Bhutan can widen markets and make ports and transport corridors more productive. For India’s border states, regional commerce can support local firms, jobs and supply chains. The South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA), which came into force in 2006, has not delivered the depth of integration originally anticipated. A tariff agreement alone cannot overcome closed or inefficient border crossings, inconsistent standards, weak logistics, payment constraints and political restrictions. Nor can regional

AdminAnalyst

arrow_outward

UNTRADITIONAL SECURITYAUGUST 14, 2026

Myanmar at a Crossroad: Mapping Political Evolution & Future Pathways

Myanmar at a Crossroad: Mapping Political Evolution & Future Pathways Red Lantern Analytica presents a new research report, “Myanmar at a Crossroad: Mapping Political Evolution & Future Pathways,” authored by Lt Col Ujjwal Abhishek Jha, Retd. The report traces Myanmar’s political evolution from independence in 1948, examining the country’s transition from an early parliamentary democracy to prolonged military rule and the recurring cycles of political upheaval and resistance. It explores the historical foundations of Myanmar’s political fragility, the legacy of colonial rule, the country’s post-independence trajectory, and the major turning points that have shaped its contemporary political landscape. The analysis seeks to map Myanmar’s present political crossroads and examine the possible pathways shaping its future, offering a structured perspective on the forces influencing the country’s political evolution. To Download PDF of this report click here

AdminAnalyst

arrow_outward

UNTRADITIONAL SECURITYAUGUST 12, 2026

Europe Without Russian Energy

How far has Europe actually moved away from Russian energy? In this report, Aadvik Chauhan examines the EU’s transition from political commitments to legally binding restrictions on Russian gas imports, while assessing the continuing role of Russian energy in Europe’s supply structure. The analysis explores energy security, divergent positions among EU member states, infrastructure constraints, renewable energy growth, and the strategic implications of Europe’s attempt to reduce dependence on Russia. The report also examines the paradox of rising Russian gas imports during the early stages of the 2026 phase-out and considers why 2027 could prove decisive for assessing the depth of Europe’s energy transition. To Download PDF of this report click here

AdminAnalyst

arrow_outward